Discuss this Topic here.
File: http://www.legitfta.com/forum/showthread.php?21272-Vix-4-SH4&p=74810#post74810
File: http://www.legitfta.com/forum/showthread.php?21272-Vix-4-SH4&p=74810#post74810
Last edited:
openvix: build 029
Add more sh4 changes
Add more sh4 changes
I dont want to come across as rude or argumentative, I just wanted to put on record that we the ViX team (I can state this as I am a senior member of the ViX team with full read / write access to the GIT) are not associated with this image as the post this thread links to wrongly claims. so for the sake of clarification I will say again that we the OpenViX team have nothing and want nothing to do with the sh4 platform.
This image was produced by a third party using our name to wrongly dupe users into thinking we are involved (you may not consider that of any consequence but we want to make sure our users know it's not us, in the same way you would if some one else cloned your forum and tried to pass them selves off as legitfta !!).
as for the above quoted entries in the changelog, they are nothing to do with us, but were added to the OE-Alliance GIT by the ATV team as they support the sh4 platform.
The OE-A git is the central repository into which all member teams contribute to and take from, but we all build our own E2 base (ATV is also based directly on our E2 which is partly why lavatronics were able to build a ViX based sh4 image, even if we dont our selves support this platform).
Why doesn't Openvix make an open statement about this SH4 image using their name?
Not to split hairs, but the SH4 comment in the Openvix log appeared right before the SH4 image. There are not any comments about SH4 until that one that I know of. OpenAtv had a SH4 image for quite a while before the Vix SH4 image appeared. Why weren't there comments about SH4 before this one? Were no comments needed or
were just none made?
I also think if you run the Vix SH4 image, you will conclude like I have that somebody somewhere with a very good connection to Openvix has worked on it.
The feeds appear to be from Vix or at least OE. And the way the image is updated online does not look like the work of a sales person.
The overall operating speed of the image seems to be very good too.
I would agree though that Lavatronics is a shady operation at best, and Amiko in general seems to like those kind of people.
WoS did briefly sell some Amiko receivers including the Alien but cancelled his order with them due to the exceptionally high failure rate out of the carton before customers even got a chance to break them.I see it quite differently my self. It's not that Amiko like those kinds of retailers it's more a case of they are the only ones who will do buisness with Amiko.
The Amiko brand are akin to the Chinese clones in that they are cheap and fail very easily. No serious retailer can deal with such a product from a warranty standpoint. Where as companies like lavatronics don't generally honour warranties so don't really care about the high failure rate.
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
Lavatronics is not on trial here, but the image that has been released at their website is.
You do not have to like or dislike a company or a person to use their E2 image.
I would agree though that Lavatronics is a shady operation at best, and Amiko in general seems to like those kind of people. Still I see no reason to beat up a E2 image just because the company that is hosting it is crap. EB
OpenVix is Enigma2 which is open source. I do not know how open source material can be ripped or stolen.
If they would have called the image by another name, then people would be saying that OpenVix did not get credit.
OpenATV admits to supping the sh4, so it makes me curios as to why go to the trouble to create the VIX sh4 image?