Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 28 of 28
  1. Collapse Details
    #21
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    7,283
    Post Thanks / Like
    Contribute If you enjoy reading the
    content here, click the below
    image to support our site.
    Click Here To Contribute To Our Site
    The Android receiver is also similar to the Marusys PrismCube Ruby which is all ready out in the Euro market and is supported by BlackHole coding group.
    Reply With Quote
     

  2. Collapse Details
    #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    9,278
    Post Thanks / Like
    Just received a tracking number from Carlos, the receiver is in Louisville, Kentucky. It should be here by tomorrow or Friday. Looking forward to testing it out on ku band.
    Reply With Quote
     

  3. Collapse Details
    #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    7,283
    Post Thanks / Like
    Cool, looking forward to your review.
    Reply With Quote
     

  4. Collapse Details
    #24
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    130
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by eastof111 View Post
    The Android receiver is also similar to the Marusys PrismCube Ruby which is all ready out in the Euro market and is supported by BlackHole coding group.
    The Prismcube Ruby retails for 279 Euros. The Qviart Undro is now listed as available from December 12th for 149 Euros! So I'm assuming that the similarity is only in software, rather than hardware. (Although, the Ruby has two tuners, I think.)

    149 Euros is an unbelievable price, if the box is really as good as it sounds. (Keep in mind that just because it says it has blind scan, doesn't mean it's fast or accurate... We need to see actual test results!)
    Reply With Quote
     

  5. Collapse Details
    #25
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    7,283
    Post Thanks / Like
    True on the price difference. It originally retailed at 249 Euros then they corrected the price. Now some places selling them as high as 299. Inflation LOL....

    "(Keep in mind that just because it says it has blind scan, doesn't mean it's fast or accurate... We need to see actual test results!)"

    True again... I learned this the hard way when a receiver was advertised as blind scan only to find out it was a software/list based scan.
    Last edited by eastof111; 11-20-2013 at 08:54 PM.
    Reply With Quote
     

  6. Collapse Details
    #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    9,278
    Post Thanks / Like
    My main purpose for a receiver is to blind scan and to test its tuner sensitivity. All other aspects are secondary.
    Reply With Quote
     

  7. Collapse Details
    #27
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    3,551
    Post Thanks / Like
    With these receivers having more powerful processors and linux or android software, would it be safe to say that 4:2:2 could be decoded with the right software inside the receiver and played back? Kind of like playing 4:2:2 recorded from an S9 openbox back through VLC?
    Portable Comtech 13', Winegard 10', SAMI 7.5', 3 39" Ku dishes one motorized. Scanning 30w-131w
    Reply With Quote
     

  8. Collapse Details
    #28
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    7,283
    Post Thanks / Like
    It depends on the chip being used. The chips that have 4.2.2 capability are more expensive. It all depends on the market the manufacturers want to target.
    Reply With Quote
     

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •