TNAP-5.1 Image Discussion

[Megatron817]

They are in TNAP5 also !!!:

[Толькі зарэгістраваныя і актываваныя карыстальнікі могуць праглядаць спасылкі. ][Толькі зарэгістраваныя і актываваныя карыстальнікі могуць праглядаць спасылкі. ]

..but they are not in 5.1 version.

I see the setting to turn on Show picons in channel selection list by using OpenWebif under settings and Channel selection menu. That Channels selection menu is missing in the gui screens of tnap 5.1 .

[el bandido]

Press menu button 2 times in Channel Selection.
[Толькі зарэгістраваныя і актываваныя карыстальнікі могуць праглядаць спасылкі. ]

[lme]

can't post anythig in Forum: C-Band Wildfeed Finds

[el bandido]

The forums are being worked on. You cannot easily attach anything right now either. Hopefully things will be straightened soon.

[lme]

Noticed 2 issues when updated tnap5 to 2024-3-24 and tnap 5.1, osmio4k+:
1) the box is sluggish when navigating through menus;
2) the versions are messing up the settings on the positioner, shifting the sat position by 17 clicks to the east.
no such issues with tnap5, 2024-3-12 update, or other image.
Any suggestions ?

[el bandido]

I do not have a working MIO+ to test. Does anyone else have the sluggish problem when navigating the menus?

Positioner locations are stored in the positioner, Not in the FTA receiver. All the enigma2 image can do is call a number such as positoon #1. The exact location of position #1 is stored in the positioner itself. So how can an image make a positioner 15 counts off when the location is stored in the positioner?

[lme]

I do not understand either: the positions # are the same in the box and the positioner.
It's strange that the same number of wrong counts (17), ocured.

I also noticed 2 different modules sizes:
TNAP5.1
avl6261.ko=68,656
wlan.ko=3,994,940

TNAP5
avl6261.ko=103,940
wlan.ko=3,995,836

[cyberham]

When saving the index for a motor position, the user is asked if you really want to save the position. You can answer yes, no or save index in the setup tuner.

[lme]

I know how the index works, but the problem is with the # of counts sent by the box to the positioner.
After using the fine tuning feature the box becames sluggish.

[el bandido]

Noticed 2 issues when updated tnap5 to 2024-3-24 and tnap 5.1, osmio4k+:
1) the box is sluggish when navigating through menus;
2) the versions are messing up the settings on the positioner, shifting the sat position by 17 clicks to the east.
no such issues with tnap5, 2024-3-12 update, or other image.
Any suggestions ?

Looks like an update is slowing the menu navigation down some. Let's see what can be done about fixing this issue.