E2 on a new Atemio Nemsis

[Pixl]

East, your file does open in a text reader. I think I see what EB mentioned but I don't have line numbers. I'll C/P here.

def correctBugsCausedByDriver(self, tplist):
if self.is_c_band_scan:
x = 0
for transponders in tplist:
if tplist[x].frequency > 4200000:
tplist[x].frequency = 5150000 - tplist[x].frequency - 9750000
x += 1



Looks like they are making 5150 be interpreted as 9750.

[el bandido]

Correct.
Now what we need to find is a blindscan pattern that is consistent, but repeatable. We need to try and get the 10750 lnb to blindscan satellites and display transponders on a satellite that are consistent. Then we can try and fix the found transponder frequencies, similar to what was done with the c band lnb.

[Pixl]

Correct.
Now what we need to find is a blindscan pattern that is consistent, but repeatable. We need to try and get the 10750 lnb to blindscan satellites and display transponders on a satellite that are consistent. Then we can try and fix the found transponder frequencies, similar to what was done with the c band lnb.

Here is what I found so far that might help. On 103w Ku Huntington Beach is down linked at 11940 V.
My single band lnb down converts 11940-10750=1190 sent down the coax.
The Nemesis thinks I'm using the lower LO, so 1190+9750=10940 which is what I see displayed on the screen as the TP received for Huntington Beach.

I'll check tonight to see what happens when TPs above the threshold on 11700 are received using the upper LO.

[Pixl]

Is there a way to display all the TP freq. in a nice view as I'm used to with the Raptor and most other receivers I've had instead of having to coax each channel individually with several steps. ??

[el bandido]

Use blindscan and save the transponders to XML...

[eastof111]

I wanted to see if there were differences in the pyo files of the embedded blind scan function of OpenNFR vs. the plugin blind scan function of PLI. There seems to be some slight variations between the two files.

[eastof111]

Someone was considerate in inserting comments....

[el bandido]

Not really considerate. Comments and remarks are more of a necessity, else you forget what you did, were doing, or were trying to do. Comments may also help others that are making changes.

I will try and put the 10750 lnb back on tomorrow and see if I can get some consistency with it when scanning for transponders.

[Pale-Rider]

It's standard practice for coders to add such comments within their work, as a way for others to follow and where necessary add their own improvements, unfortunately not all will do so.

You can see exactly who made did what and when here

https://github.com/oe-alliance/oe-alliance-plugins/commits/2.3/Blindscan

you can also click on the individual entries to see exactly what was added or removed at every step of the way along with any and all comments made by the authors. such as this one here

https://github.com/oe-alliance/oe-alliance-plugins/commit/992fcebc91856ae1db0d4c30c064232867a3471a

[eastof111]

I've seen my share of coders actually removing comments.