Thread: DR HD D15

Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst 123456
Results 51 to 55 of 55

Hybrid View

  1. Collapse Details
    #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    9,278
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by rrob311 View Post
    Ive been testing this receiver's scan against my other blind scanning boxes and while it is a bit slower, it is consistently scanning in more channels than all of the receivers tested so far. I have over a 100' cable run through multiple switches and couplers, etc but this box is definitely a keeper.
    C band or ku Rob? I noticed both Dr hd units on ku blind scan would scan in dummy tp with excellent signal but no audio or video.
    Reply With Quote
     

  2. Thanks rodder thanked for this post
  3. Collapse Details
    #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    3,551
    Post Thanks / Like
    I definitely want an earlier model Technomate if the scan is even more sensitive than this one.
    Portable Comtech 13', Winegard 10', SAMI 7.5', 3 39" Ku dishes one motorized. Scanning 30w-131w
    Reply With Quote
     

  4. Thanks rodder thanked for this post
  5. Collapse Details
    #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    3,551
    Post Thanks / Like
    Both, I was mainly testing my fixed ku dish at 103w and my 7.5' SAMI at 58w. It is most effective on 103w ku with all of the news feeds and how the transponders are spaced. Some of the channels that were weaker it had a little better luck showing a picture. I am running the 144 software. It seems to need about 5db in order to lock but I am going to try and run a direct coax to it and retest it.
    Portable Comtech 13', Winegard 10', SAMI 7.5', 3 39" Ku dishes one motorized. Scanning 30w-131w
    Reply With Quote
     

  6. Thanks rodder thanked for this post
    Likes Costactc liked this post
  7. Collapse Details
    #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    9,278
    Post Thanks / Like
    The blind scan on the tm 5302 is the most sensitive I have ever tested but its speed is as slow as molasses.
    Reply With Quote
     

  8. Thanks rodder, rrob311 thanked for this post
  9. Collapse Details
    #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    3,551
    Post Thanks / Like
    So far the only strange transponder that this is picking up for me is on 91W KU and that's because it scanned in a stronger Bev transponder. Probably a bug where it will scan an encrypted transponder on a fta scan.
    Portable Comtech 13', Winegard 10', SAMI 7.5', 3 39" Ku dishes one motorized. Scanning 30w-131w
    Reply With Quote
     

  10. Thanks Costactc thanked for this post
Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst 123456

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •